Why are theorists excited about exotic nuclei?

Nuclei are at the heart of all palpable matter.11. National Research Council, Nuclear Physics: Exploring Heart Matter, Academies Press (2013). Although we understand properties things touch every day—from carbon in our bodies to lanthanum cell phones—so much more may be revealed by investigating elements limits their stability. Those become apparent when too many neutrons or protons added a nucleus. Matter falls apart different ways, emitting particles and radiation, say, fissioning into lighter elements. Indeed, world’s seem finely tuned as subtle interplay components nuclear force. can either hold nucleus together doom it nonexistence.Collectively known nucleons, form building blocks nuclei. A isotope is characterized mass number charge Z; each contains Z N = A–Z neutrons. few hundred isotopes exist naturally on Earth. Many thousands others short-lived constantly being created numerous corners universe.Nuclear physics has always been an essential component astrophysical phenomena. Roughly half heavy found solar system originate from chain reactions triggered neutron star mergers violent collapse massive stars. Exotic nuclei created, if only for instant. major ambition generation where how matter forms.22. US Department Energy Office Science, Reaching Horizon: The 2015 Long Range Plan Science (2015). neutron-rich piece that puzzle.Discerning constitutes research field low-energy physics. At state-of-the-art facilities, rare-isotope beams produced purifying shower products collisions between stable then stopped traps high-precision measurements basic properties, such radius, sent beamlines, they interact with target produce various provide crucial information about underlying force.Despite undertaking—from planning executing experiments interpreting results—those most often designed study one single isotope. Over past five decades, researchers have measured hundreds fill so-called chart. Critics complain what’s done amounts mere stamp collecting. But process important step understanding world works: Simple patterns emerge chart, outlined figure 1; those patterns, gather deep insights force predict new Figure 1. chart isotopes, plotted atomic color coded according isotopes’ lifetimes. inset shows detail calcium scandium isotopic chains. consequence quantum chromodynamic Lagrangian L. Identifying chains yields deeper (Image Donna Padian.) PPT|High-resolutionThe theorists’ dream manifestations originates fundamental forces—strong, weak, electromagnetic, gravitational. primarily strong electromagnetic forces. its name implies, so instances cannot treated perturbation. Quantum chromodynamics (QCD) explains quarks come triples protons. Because perturbative approach QCD not applicable neutrons, protons, nuclei, large-scale numerical computations required, which placed lattice acted upon Lagrangian. (See article Carleton DeTar Steven Gottlieb, Physics Today, February 2004, page 45.)Why don’t theorists calculate carbon-12 36-quark problem uranium-238 714-quark problem? That would direct approach. required solve even dozen take years using largest supercomputer US. Evidently, simulating vast majority directly will remain future.Fortunately alternative exists. energy scale orders magnitude higher than energies determine there well-controlled ways connect And through connection, reality. Connecting rootSection:ChooseTop pageABSTRACTConnecting root <<Limits stabilityProbing react...Theory crosses bordersBeyond stabilityNew facilitiesReferences long do need explicitly include models describe properties. Simply taking enough reproduce features isotopes. effective was traditionally determined fits large body nucleon–nucleon (NN) data. Thanks close collaborations experimentalists over had improved end 1990s resulting NN interactions perfectly described relevant few-nucleon properties.33. R. Machleidt, Phys. Rev. C 63, 024001 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.63.024001 Even so, no connection established theory interaction emerge. What needed path bridge gluons. Only transformation could chance evolving descriptive predictive science. toward bridging first introduced Ubirajara (Bira) van Kolck collaborators effective-field theory.44. U. Kolck, 645, 273 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0375-9474(98)00612-5 Imagine you image enormous resolution, but really know whether giant gorilla sits center image. To end, low-resolution picture suffice. Effective-field tool physicist use controllably blur picture, reduce complexity, make computationally tractable. averages out interactions’ short-range provides parameters QCD. used many-body Limits stabilitySection:ChooseTop rootLimits stability <<Probing Not settled nuclear-force land. In stability, encounters stringent tests. Such why should excited studies exotic answers; detect wrong. Were Coulomb force, pairs because nucleons slightly attractive neutron–neutron proton–proton interaction. repulsion gets heavier, needs glue keeps together. For example, 12C, six whereas lead 208Pb, 126 82 Nature produces asymmetry larger 208Pb’s. imbalance becomes large, unstable decays, nucleon emission beta decay. both cases nature tries restore system’s referred drip line, last isotope, bound state given chain. Strange happen limits: Nuclei, thought compact objects, develop halos extended skins (see, reference 55. J. Al-Khalili, Halo Morgan & Claypool (2017).). Lithium-11 famous example. It composed tightly core (lithium-9) two valence spend time away resemble halo. An example skin tin Their probability distribution extends farther proton distribution, surface exist. systems, extent them solving nonrelativistic Schrödinger equation. valley likelihood finding far zero. case 2 contrasts wavefunction unstable, loosely 2. states limit potential V(r) nucleus’s distance r sketched red. Classically, able move outside classically allowed region (vertical dashed line). well bound: Its E0 typically ?7 MeV (purple curve) dies quickly region. E1 ?0.1 (blue beyond PPT|High-resolution lives life forbidden region, mass. exhibits characteristically tail wavefunction. tails strongly imprint themselves nucleons’ binding energies, radii, deformations, responses. early days posed several challenges theory. First, greater precision calculations. average per 12C 208Pb 7 MeV. However, look chain, typical binds 0.1 studying 1 good enough. improve order magnitude. Second, traditional methods simply capture fell short predictions. decade, efforts deal systems exploded. common expand harmonic-oscillator basis states—functions fall off faster exponential dependence radius—to exploit analytic advantages. revolution recently taken place, introducing bases tails. What’s more, increase computational power, scaling computation number. turn millennium, ab initio calculation up 12C. today, compute 132Sn, extraordinary feat.66. V. Manea et al., Lett. 124, 092502 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.124.092502 competitive approaches now nearing standard. impressive progress uncovered shortcomings increased, mismatch experiment reveals lack accuracy appears blurry mentioned earlier pick details barely systems. As turns out, exactly small force—those significant systems—become key. rooted theory, calculated. improvement comes cost some technical complications embodied higher-order Nevertheless, courageous bunch tackling work. Probing reactionsSection:ChooseTop react... <<Theory Ever since Ernest Rutherford’s gold-foil experiment, scientists Now, ever, essential. rare interested decay made targets. Fortunately, factories generate beam. serves probe. versatile tools offer knobs turn.77. I. Thompson, F. M. Nunes, Reactions Astrophysics: Principles, Calculation Applications Low-Energy Reactions, Cambridge (2009). On hand, reaction takes place scattering angles serve adjust penetrability angle variability allow scan way akin tomography. positron tomography (PET) scans, create three-dimensional other depending choice particle detector, information. When, halo beryllium-11 collides target, same time. Most 11Be nucleus—composed well-bound 10Be radially orbital—passes unscathed. does react, ground yet suffer elastically scattered deflection. Or undergo inelastic excitation, break fragments, gain picking fuse target. type detector that’s determines channel studied extracted. measure scattering, examine radiation de-excitation; extract transition occur. Like themselves, ruled mechanics. depicted 3, simple consists incoming wave impinges generated distorts wave, distortion part deflected near side collision interferes that, order, analogous diffraction light. pattern gives range 3. Elastic best waves: (a) Part beam parts side. paths differ, accumulated phases reach detector. (b) result interference related size original give rise channels, intensity reduced.77. We think driven another sort interaction—that reacting optical potential, imaginary removes flux wave. what happens light absorbed travels medium. perspective daunting pursuit. theories discussed help address hand. simulate ongoing, they’re limited systems.88. Raimondi 93, 054606 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.93.054606 heavier level simplification required: casting few-body above-mentioned potential. connects quark degrees freedom clean straightforward, albeit technologically challenging, goes nucleus–nucleus less controlled still largely phenomenological. One greatest formal QCD, dependent respect, work remains done.99. C. W. Johnson G: Nucl. Part. 47, 123001 https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6471/abb129 Theory bordersSection:ChooseTop borders <<Beyond crossroads fields—from astrophysics chemistry condensed-matter plays key role establishing connections fields. interdisciplinarity symmetries interface high-energy quest neutrinoless double decay, tells us neutrino own antiparticle, involve (see January 2010, 20). Accurate theoretical predictions nuclear-structure detecting ingredient experiment’s success. respects, test beds standard model. involving baryon universe. explored searching permanent electric dipole moments1010. Lister, Butterworth, 497, 190 https://doi.org/10.1038/497190a pear-shaped radium-225 protactinium-229. Norval Fortson, Patrick Sandars, Steve Barr, June 2003, 33.) received public attention astrophysics. Since 10 seconds history cosmos, shaped fuel astronomical universe synthesized pervades lives. Nucleosynthesis, produced, occurs stars explosive environments supernovae mergers. extreme environments, nucleosynthesis steps proton-rich thus inputs simulations. illustration intersection detection gravitational waves counterpart neutron-star merger GW170817. signal offered independent constraint equation stars.1111. Horowitz, Ann. 411, 167992 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aop.2019.167992 caused shivers communities. Often, interest directly, indirect must probe information.1212. Nunes Annu. Sci. 70, 147 https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-nucl-020620-063734,1313. G. Potel Eur. 53, 178 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1140/epja/i2017-12371-9 also cut across complex phenomena emerge, just molecular physics.1414. Lei 98, 051001 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.98.051001 So surprise similar phenomena—halos, Efimov states, deformation, phase transitions, others—occur Likewise, widely applied physics; molecules With predictive, learning statistics quantify uncertainties experimental design.1515. B. King 122, 232502 https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.122.232502 Beyond <<New frontier around 100, point particular together, energetically advantageous emit alpha ever neutron–proton asymmetry, eventually longer stay attached cases, effects continuum—the unbound above threshold. large-mass society. mercury thermometers barometers; weights batteries; 238U, main reactors, spring mind. Oganesson, heaviest element periodic table, 118 lifetime millisecond. growth methods, describing rely density functionals Andrew Zangwill, July 2015, 34). informed fitted masses island superheavy Yuri T. Oganessian Krzysztof P. Rykaczewski, August 32.) location uncertain, reside copernicium-112 side, ? 184. phenomenological functional despite validity regions data exist, unreliable extrapolating complex, here, too, trying theories. second concerns asymmetry. neutron-to-proton ratio (N/Z) one. increasing repulsion, N/Z 1.5. helium-8 (N/Z 3) 9C 0.5); chains, Sn, 32 isotopes; stars, perplexing exists, 20. Precisely predicting maximum while keeping theories, especially whose exceeds 20, halos, hang central earlier. decorrelated rest nucleus, theories—in nucleons—are adequate When attraction obtained adding keep bound, positive domain. States sometimes elusive particularly Examples tetraneutron,1616. K. Fossez 119, 032501 https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.119.032501 hypothetical cluster four neutrons; 10He resonance 5); two-neutron radioactivity1717. A. E. Lovell, 95, 034605 https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.95.034605 16Be. New facilitiesSection:ChooseTop facilities <<References Around world, technology advancing rapidly. discovered Rare Isotope Beam Factory began operation decade ago RIKEN Institute Japan. physicists start operations Facility Beams (FRIB) next year Michigan State University.1818. Glasmacher News 27, 28 https://doi.org/10.1080/10619127.2017.1317176 facility, partly shown 4, expected nearly 80% predicted including dripline. 4. shape highest-energy superconducting heavy-ion linear accelerator world. begins operating 2022, facility accelerate ions hydrogen uranium least 200 MeV/nucleon in-beam fragmentation. (Courtesy Beams.) bent three segments, FRIB accelerates primary speed formed production separated guided halls, reaccelerated beamlines. producing decades. Unique 400 kW power accelerator. expands accelerator’s areas: machine explore Sn beam’s intensity, channels simultaneously accurately before. Along way, likely unveil unexpected scratching heads. (QCD), represented here tree. Through (the tree’s trunk) (its branches), fruits). Orla/Shutterstock.com.) This supported NSF under grant PHY-1811815. ReferencesSection:ChooseTop <<1. Google Scholar2. Scholar3. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.63.024001, ScholarCrossref4. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0375-9474(98)00612-5, ScholarCrossref5. ScholarCrossref6. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.124.092502, ScholarCrossref7. ScholarCrossref8. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.93.054606, ScholarCrossref9. https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6471/abb129, ScholarCrossref10. https://doi.org/10.1038/497190a, ScholarCrossref11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aop.2019.167992, ScholarCrossref12. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-nucl-020620-063734, ScholarCrossref13. https://doi.org/10.1140/epja/i2017-12371-9, ScholarCrossref14. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.98.051001, ScholarCrossref15. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.122.232502, ScholarCrossref16. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.119.032501, ScholarCrossref17. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.95.034605, ScholarCrossref18. https://doi.org/10.1080/10619127.2017.1317176, ScholarCrossref© 2021 American Physics.